Post by Flaming Glory on Jul 13, 2005 16:56:57 GMT -5
Pro slaughter people and organizations make the claim that slaughter prevents starvation Yet there is no scientific proof to this claim.
Here is PROOF, the following horses were sold for slaughter:
The availability of slaughter did not protect these horses from starvation. These horses suffered for a long time before their owners decided to rid themselves of the problem by sending the horse to an auction or selling the horse to a concerned horse lover who purchased the horse as a means of rescuing the horse from the neglectful situation.
It appears that the option of slaughter has not prevented the owners of these horses from failing to provide them with necessary food. None of the owners of these horses were punished for their bad behavior. Instead they were rewarded for their misdeed with money.
Slaughter did not prevent them from slowly starving to death. These horses did not become this thin because one day the owner decided not to feed and water them. If that were the case, the horses would have died from dehydration in less than a week. More likely the owners failed to properly feed them for months and quite possibly years. Many owners of neglected horses never sell them, instead they let them die where they are, and then they purchase more horses so they can repeat the process. Just ask law enforcement officers who have investigated numerous cases of starvation, not a pro slaughter individual who has never investigated a case of cruelty, and is just repeating what the pro slaughter organizations are stating with no research or scientific evidence to back up their claim.
Here is PROOF, the following horses were sold for slaughter:
The availability of slaughter did not protect these horses from starvation. These horses suffered for a long time before their owners decided to rid themselves of the problem by sending the horse to an auction or selling the horse to a concerned horse lover who purchased the horse as a means of rescuing the horse from the neglectful situation.
It appears that the option of slaughter has not prevented the owners of these horses from failing to provide them with necessary food. None of the owners of these horses were punished for their bad behavior. Instead they were rewarded for their misdeed with money.
Slaughter did not prevent them from slowly starving to death. These horses did not become this thin because one day the owner decided not to feed and water them. If that were the case, the horses would have died from dehydration in less than a week. More likely the owners failed to properly feed them for months and quite possibly years. Many owners of neglected horses never sell them, instead they let them die where they are, and then they purchase more horses so they can repeat the process. Just ask law enforcement officers who have investigated numerous cases of starvation, not a pro slaughter individual who has never investigated a case of cruelty, and is just repeating what the pro slaughter organizations are stating with no research or scientific evidence to back up their claim.
